- Abstract:
- Intensification of subsurface use is an obligatory and necessary condition for the constant and, unfortunately, uncontrolled expansion of reproduction of all kinds of material goods and infrastructure systems that ensure the well-being of the rapidly growing population of our planet. The geological setting of the location of ore deposits leads to the fact that mining enterprises under construction and operated acquire the role of the vanguard of man-made intrusion into the natural biota of the Earth, and the degree of environmental danger of inevitable changes in this biota determines both the conditions of existence of natural biotopes in vast territories and the possibility of their restoration in the post-exploitation period. That is why the purpose of the study is constantly relevant – the features and dynamics of the course of digressive successions of specific phytocenoses in the zones of man-made impact of mining enterprises, depending on the structure and nature of the use of land allotments necessary for effective subsurface use.
- Keywords:
- subsurface use, development of the Anthroposphere, anthropogenic damage and degradation of natural biota, species diversity, infrastructure, mining enterprise, surface complex, flora, entomofauna, methodology, design
- For citation:
- Galchenko Yu. P. The influence of the disturbed land structure on the environmental consequences of subsurface use in the development of ore deposits. Mine Surveying and Subsurface Use. 2024;(5):100-104. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.56195/20793332_2024_5_100_104.
- Information about the authors:
-
- Yury P. Galchenko – Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof., Corresponding member Russian Academy of Ecology, Chief Researcher of the Department of Mountain Ecology, Institute of Comprehensive Exploitation of Mineral Resources Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation, e-mail:
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
- Yury P. Galchenko – Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof., Corresponding member Russian Academy of Ecology, Chief Researcher of the Department of Mountain Ecology, Institute of Comprehensive Exploitation of Mineral Resources Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation, e-mail:
- References:
-
- 1. Государственный доклад о состоянии и об охране окружающей среды РФ в 2022 году. Минприроды России, НПП. М., 2022. 844 с. [Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia, NPP. State report on the state and environmental protection of the Russian Federation in 2022. Moscow, 2022. (In Russ.)].
- 2. Трубецкой КН, Галченко ЮП. Природоподобная технология комплексного освоения недр – проблемы и перспективы. М.: Научтехлитиздат, 2020. 367 с. [Trubetskoy KN, Galchenko YuP. Nature-like technology of integrated development of the subsoil – problems and prospects. Moscow, 2020 (In Russ.)].
- 3. Моисеев НН. Человек и ноосфера. М.: Молодая гвардия, 1990. 351 с. [Moiseev NN. Man and the noosphere. Moscow, 1990 (In Russ.)].
- 4. Хван ТА. Экологические основы природопользования. М.: Юрайт, 2019. 253 с. [Hwang TA. Ecological foundations of nature management. Moscow, 2019 (In Russ.)].
- 5. Бодрийяр Ж. Фатальные стратегии. М.: Рипол-классик, 2019. 352 с. [Badriyar J. Fatal strategies. Moscow, 2019 (In Russ.)].
- 6. Галченко ЮП, Еременко ВА. Природно-технические системы подземной разработки рудных месторождений на основе конвергентных горных технологий. М.: Горная книга, 2023. 288 с. [Galchenko YuP, Eremenko VA. Natural and technical systems of underground mining of ore deposits based on convergent mining technologies. Moscow, 2023 (In Russ.)].
- 7. Hacker PW, Coops NC, Laliberte E, et al. Variations in accuracy of leaf functional trait prediction due to spectral mixing. Ecological Indicators. 2022;136:108687.
- 8. Krupskaya LT, Filatova MY, Kolobanov KA, et al. Remote sensing for environmental safety of forest ecosystems within the tailings impact of a closed tin ore company. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;806(1):012017. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/806/1/012017.
- 9. Galchenko Yu, Ozaryan Yu. Method of quantitative assessment of the regularities of natural restoration of biota in zones of technogenic disturbance by extractive enterprises. E3S Web Conf. 2018;56:04006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/ e3sconf/20185604006.
- 10. Navarro A, Young M, Allan B, et al. The application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to estimate aboveground biomass of mangrove ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2020;242:111747. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111747.
- 11. Yang X, Li F, Fan W, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of wind protection by windbreaks based on remote sensing and geographic information systems. Agroforestry Systems. 2021;95:353-65. DOI: 10.1007/s10457-021-00594-x.
- 12. Климина ЕМ, Остроухов АВ. Ландшафтно-экологическое зонирование муниципальных районов (на примере Хабаровского края. Региональные проблемы. 2022;25(3):28–30. [Klimina EM, Ostroukhov AV. Landscape and ecological zoning of municipal districts (on the example of the Khabarovsk Territory. Regional problems. 2022;25(3):28-30. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.31433/2618-9593-2022-25-3-28-30.
- 13. Озарян ЮА. Оценка естественного восстановления биоты в зоне воздействия горнодобывающих предприятий Хабаровского края по данным спутникового мониторинга. Горный журнал. 2018;(10):84–88. [Ozaryan YuA. Assessment of the natural restoration of biota in the zone of impact of mining enterprises of the Khabarovsk Territory according to satellite monitoring data. Mining Journal. 2018;(10):84-8]. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2018.10.16 (In Russ.).
- 14. Озарян ЮА, Бубнова МБ, Усиков ВИ. Методика дистанционного мониторинга природно-технических систем (на примере горнопромышленных районов юга Дальневосточного региона). Горный журнал. 2020;(2):84–89. [Ozaryan YuA, Bubnov MB, Usikov VI. Methods of remote monitoring of natural and technical systems (on the example of mining regions of the south of the Far Eastern region). Mining Journal. 2020;(2):84-9 (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2020.02.13.
- 15. Саулова ТА, Бас ВИ. Техносферная безопасность. Красноярск: Изд. СибГУ, 2021. 86 с. [Saulova TA, Bas VI. Technosphere safety. Krasnoyarsk, 2021 (In Russ.)].
- 16. Туктамышев ИР, Широких ПС, Муллагулов РЮ. Об информативности спектральных каналов и NDVI спутника ДЗЗ Landsat 5 TM Landsat 7 ETM+ для оценки стадий зарастания леса заброшенных сельскохозяйственных территорий. Экобиотех. 2021;4(3):178–185. [Tuktamyshev IR, Shirokikh PS, Mullagulov RYu. On the information content of spectral channels and NDVI of the remote sensing satellite Landsat 5 TM Landsat 7 ETM+ for assessing the stages of overgrowth of forests in abandoned agricultural areas. Ecobiotech. 2021;4(3)178-85 (In Russ.)]. DOI:10.31163/2618-964X-2021-4-3-178-185.
- 17. Будищев АФ. Описание лесов Приморской области. Главные официальные документы по управлению Восточной Сибирью. Изд. 2-е. Хабаровск, 1898. 465 с. [Budishchev AF. Description of the forests of the Primorsky region. The main official documents on the management of Eastern Siberia. 2nd edition. Khabarovsk, 1898 (In Russ.)].
- 18. Комаров ВЛ. Типы растительности Южно-Уссурийского края. Труды почвенно-ботанической экспедиции Росс. академии наук. М., 1917. 260 с. [Komarov VL. Vegetation types of the South Ussuri region. Proceedings of the Ross Soil and Botanical Expedition. Academy of Sciences. Moscow, 1917 (In Russ.)].
- 19. Пржевальский ИМ. Путешествия в Уссурийский край 1867–69 гг. М., 1937. 467 с. [Przhevalsky IM. Travels to the Ussuri region 1867-69. 2nd edition. Moscow, 1937 (In Russ.)].
- 20. Колесников БИ. Кедровые леса Дальнего Востока. Л.: АН СССР, 1956. 262 с. [Kolesnikov BI. Cedar forests of the Far East. Leningrad, 1956 (In Russ.)].
