A A A Ц Ц Ц Ц

ШРИФТ:

Arial Times New Roman

ИНТЕРВАЛ:

х1 х1.5 х2

КЕРНИНГ:

Обычный Средний Большой

ИЗОБРАЖЕНИЯ:

Черно-белые Цветные
For the visually impaired Standard Version
Scientific, Technological and Production Journal
ISSN 2079–3332 (print)
ISSN 3034-6835 (online)
founded in 2001

Study of the scapping capacity of the cylindrical bucket of the excavator

Original articles: 2024 No 6

Study of the scapping capacity of the cylindrical bucket of the excavator

DOI: 10.56195/20793332_2024_6_95_99

Read in pdf G. G. Burуj
  1. Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education «The Siberian State Automobile and Highway University» (FSBEI HE «SibADI»), Omsk, Russian Federation
p. 95-99, No.6/2024
Abstract:
The article considers the issue of reducing the resistance forces to digging on the excavator bucket. A cylindrical design of the excavator bucket is proposed. The purpose of the work is to confirm the beneficial effect of using a cylindrical bucket. For this purpose, models of a standard and cylindrical bucket were manufactured. Both models were installed in a stand to compare their scooping capacity. The dependences of the moments of forces when scooping different volumes of soil with the tested buckets are given.
Keywords:
excavator, bucket, digging, soil volume, torque
For citation:
Burуj G. G. Study of the scapping capacity of the cylindrical bucket of the excavator. Mine Surveying and Subsurface Use. 2024;(6):95-99. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.56195/20793332_2024_6_95_99.
Information about the authors:
  1. Grigorij G. Buryj – Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, FSBEI HE «SibADI», 644034, Omsk, Russian Federation, https://orcid. org/0000-0002-5008-9176, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
References:
  1. 1. Nikolaev VA. Energy consumption for cutting the soil with buckets of a continuous unit to form the underlying layer of the road. Bulletin of SibADI. 2020;76(6):676-88. DOI: 10.26518/2071-7296-2020-17-6-676-688 (In Russ.).
  2. 2. Litvin OI, Нoreshok AA, Dubinkin DM, et al. Analysis of methods for calculating the productivity of quarry hydraulic excavators. Mining. 2022;5:112-20. DOI: 10.30686/1609-9192-2022-5-112-120 (In Russ.).
  3. 3. Nikolaev VA. Analysis of the interaction of the edge of the cantilever knife blade with the ground. Bulletin of SibADI. 2020;72(2):172-81. DOI:10.26518/2071-7296-2020-17-2-172-181 (In Russ.).
  4. 4. Lukashuk OA. Regularities of formation of regime parameters of main mechanisms of quarry excavator in process of rock excavation. Mining equipment and electromechanics. 2019;143(3):14-7. DOI: 10.26730/1816-4528-2019-3-14-17 (In Russ.).
  5. 5. Troyanovskaya IP, Raznoshinskaya AV, Koz`miny`h VA, et al. Experimental studies of the process of industrial soil loosening. Mountain magazine. 2021;5:87-90. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2021.05.11 (In Russ.).
  6. 6. Kujundžić T, Klanfar M, Korman T, et al. Influence of crushed rock properties on the productivity of a hydraulic excavator. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2021;11(5):1-15. DOI: 10.3390/app11052345.
  7. 7. Choudhary BS. Effect of blast induced rock fragmentation and muckpile angle on excavator performance in surface mines. Mining of Mineral Deposits. 2019;13(3):119-26. DOI: 10.33271/mining13.03.119.
  8. 8. Xu G, Yu Z, Lu N, et al. High-gain observer-based sliding mode control for hydraulic excavators. Harbin Gongcheng Daxue Xuebao. 2021;42(6):885-92. DOI: 10.11990/jheu.201911056.
  9. 9. Pozharskij DA. Periodic contact and mixed elasticity theory problems (overview). News of higher educational institutions. 2021;210(2):22-33. DOI:10.18522/1026-2237-2021-2-22-33 (In Russ.).
  10. 10. Bosakov SV. To the solution of the contact problem for a rectangular plate on an elastic half-space. Science and Technology. 2020;19(3):224-229. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21122/2227-1031-2020-19-3-224-229 (In Russ.).
  11. 11. Linnik EYu. Assessment of contact stresses when inserting the striker into strong soil. Problems of strength and ductility. 2020;82(1):52-63. DOI:10.32326/1814-9146-2020-82-1-52-63 (In Russ.).
  12. 12. Bosakov SV, Kotov YuN. Contact task for the plate, subject to restrictions on its some movements. Structural mechanics and calculation of structures. 2022;300(1):54-8. DOI: 10.37538/0039-2383.2022.1.54.58 (In Russ.).
  13. 13. Brovka AG, Dedyulya IV, Murashko AA. Dependence of strength characteristics of argillite-like clay on the amount of unfrozen water. Nature management. 2021;2:96-105. DOI: 10.47612/2079-3928-2021-2-96-105 (In Russ.).
  14. 14. Patent RUS №218368/ 23.05.2023. Byul. №15. Bury`j GG. Kovsh e`kskavatora. Available from: ПМ №218368 (fips.ru) (In Russ.).
  15. 15. Bury`j GG, Shherbakov VS, Poteryaev IK. Increase Single Bucket Excavator Productivity by Improving Bucket Shape. Bulletin of Bryansk State Technical University. 2019;84(11):38-45. DOI: 10.30987/1999-8775-2019-2019-11-38-45 (In Russ.).

 

Управление топливными ресурсами

New materials