A A A Ц Ц Ц Ц

ШРИФТ:

Arial Times New Roman

ИНТЕРВАЛ:

х1 х1.5 х2

КЕРНИНГ:

Обычный Средний Большой

ИЗОБРАЖЕНИЯ:

Черно-белые Цветные
For the visually impaired Standard Version
Scientific, Technological and Production Journal
ISSN 2079–3332 (print)
ISSN 3034-6835 (online)
founded in 2001

Criteria and methods for assessing the environmental efficiency of subsurface use in a sustainable manner

Original articles: 2026 No 2

Criteria and methods for assessing the environmental efficiency of subsurface use in a sustainable manner

DOI: 10.56195/20793332-2026-26-2-59-64

Read in pdf Yu. P. Galchenko, E. D. Yakusheva
  1. Institute of Comprehensive Exploitation of Mineral Resources Russian Academy of Sciences (ICEMR RAS), Moscow, Russian Federation
p. 59-64, No.2/2026
Abstract:
The article presents a new methodology for quantifying the environmental efficiency of integrated subsurface development, taking into account the limitations and principles of sustainable development of the mineral resource complex. It is shown that the uncontrollable aggravation of the ecological crisis generated by the systemic antagonism between man and the biosphere, in conditions of the obvious need to preserve the natural environment as a guarantee of the survival of future generations, gradually changes the vector of development of society in the direction of increasing the importance of the ecological imperative, both in general principles and in local methods of building the technosphere. It has been established that the outstripping growth of environmental problems in the field of subsurface use is associated not only with the obvious discrepancy between the rates of consumption of various metals and the geologically caused decrease in the availability of mineral resources of the subsurface, but also, mainly, with the complete absence of motivating technical and economic motives and biologically justified incentives to search for innovative ways of greening the technological paradigm of both the technosphere as a whole and and subsurface use, in particular. A theory and methodology for overcoming these contradictions are proposed based on replacing a purely monetary approach to assessing the environmental consequences of man-made changes in the subsurface with biologically relevant criteria and methods that meet the requirements and limitations of the UN Concept of Sustainable Development of Nature and Society and the current Environmental Doctrine of the Russian Federation.
Keywords:
subsurface development, ecological crisis, biota conservation, ecologization of the paradigm, stimulation, justification, methodology, differentiated criteria, methods, subsurface use, sustainable development, environmental efficiency
For citation:
Galchenko Yu.P., Yakusheva E.D. Criteria and methods for assessing the environmental efficiency of subsurface use in a sustainable manner. Mine Surveying and Subsurface Use. 2026; 26 (2): 59-64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.56195/207933322026-26-2-59-64.
Information about the authors:
  1. Yury P. Galchenko – Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Chief Researcher of the Department of Mountain Ecology, Institute of Comprehensive Exploitation of Mineral Resources Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
  2. Ekaterina D. Yakusheva – Leading Engineer of the laboratory of geotechnology of complex development of mineral deposits, Institute of Comprehensive Exploitation of Mineral Resources of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
References:
  1. 1. Галченко Ю.П. Человек как «геологическая сила» и перспективы геономии. Наука и общество в XX–XXI вв.: сборник научных трудов: Часть первая. Москва, 2024: 210-237. Galchenko Yu.P. Man as a «geological force» and the prospects of geonomy. Science and Society in the XX–XXI centuries: Part one, Moscow, 2024: 210-237. (In Russ.).
  2. 2. World Resources Record 2022 / World Resourced Institute. URL: https://tools-wri.org/publication.
  3. 3. Hodge R.A., Ericsson M., Lof O., et al. The global mining industry: corporate profile, complexity, and change. Mineral Economics. 2022; 35 (3-4):587-606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-022-00343-1.
  4. 4. World Energy Outlook 2024. URL: htpps://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics.
  5. 5. Михайлов В.Г. Обзор современных направлений обеспечения экологической безопасности. Journal of Mining and Geotehnikal engineering. 2023; 1 (23): 71-91. https://doi.org/10.26730/2618-7434-2023-1-71-97. Mikhailov V.G. Review of modern trends in environmental safety. Journal of Mining and Geotehnikal engineering. 2023; 1 (23): 71-91. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26730/2618-7434-2023-1-71-97.
  6. 6. XXXII Моисеевские чтения: научно-практическая конференция «Система «УЧИТЕЛЬ» академика Н.Н. Моисеева и современная историческая обстановка: Философские, эколого-политологические и педагогические основания для научного анализа». Москва, 2025. URL: https://mnepu-ras.ru XXXII Moiseev Readings – scientific and practical conference «The TEACHER system – Academician N.N. Moiseev and the modern historical situation: Philosophical, ecological, political and pedagogical foundations for scientific analysis». Moscow, 2025. (In Russ.). URL: https://mnepuras. ru
  7. 7. Туртыгина Н.А., Охрименко А.В., Фролов Н.А. Классификация способов стабилизации качества рудопотока при подземной добыче. Рациональное освоение недр. 2023; 4: 32-40. https://doi.org/10.26121/RON.2023.51.61.002. Turtygina N.A., Okhrimenko A.V., Frolov N.A. Classification of methods for stabilizing the quality of ore flow during underground mining. Rational development of the subsoil. 2023; 4: 32-40. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26121/RON.2023.51.61.002.
  8. 8. United Nations «Global Sustainable Development Report (GSDR) 2023». United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Sustainable Development. URL: https://sdgs.un.org/gsdr/gsdr2023.
  9. 9. Хмылёв В.Л., Кондрасюк В.А. Коммуникативные стандарты интенсивности когнитивного резонанса. Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2015; 390: 66-72. Khmylev V.L., Kondrasyuk V.A. Communicative standards of cognitive resonance intensity. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2015; 390: 66-72. (In Russ.).
  10. 10. Кричевский С.В. Экологическая история техники от технологий до техносферы. XX – начало XXI века. Методология, опыт, перспективы: монография. Москва, 2023: 367. Krichevsky S.V. The ecological history of technology from technology to the technosphere. XX – the beginning of the XXI century. Methodology, experience, prospects: a monograph. Moscow, 2023: 367. (In Russ.).
  11. 11. Weiss M., Coelho V.N. Open pit mining operational planning using Multi Agent Systems. Procedia Computer Science. 2021; 192: 1677-1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.172.
  12. 12. Джевага Н.В., Чухланцева Т.П. Промышленные отходы в горнодобывающей отрасли: современное состояние и пути решения проблем. Наука, технологии, общество: экологический инжиниринг в интересах устойчивого развития территорий: III Всероссийская научная конференция с международным участием. Красноярск, 2022: 210-216. Dzhevaga N.V., Chukhlantseva T.P. Industrial waste in the mining industry: current state and ways to solve problems. III All-Russian scientific conference with international participation «Science, Technology, Society: environmental engineering in the interests of sustainable development of territories». Krasnoyarsk, 2022: 210-216. (In Russ.).
  13. 13. Волкова Н.П., Волкова А.А. Особенности реализации концепции устойчивого развития: проблемы и перспективы. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 12: Политические науки. 2023; 3: 32-48. Volkova N.P., Volkova A.A. Features of the implementation of the concept of sustainable development: problems and prospects. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Ser. 12. Political sciences. 2023; 3: 32-48. (In Russ.).
  14. 14. Wang Z., Wang G., Ran T., et al. Assessment of soil fertility degradation affected by mining disturbance and land use in a coalfield via machine learning. Ecological Indicators. 2021; 125: 107608. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIN0.2021.107608.
  15. 15. Фейнман Р., Лейтон Р., Сэндс М. Феймановские лекции по физике. Москва, 1965: 110. Feynman R., Leighton R., Sands M. Feyman lectures on Physics. Moscow, 1965: 110. (In Russ.).
  16. 16. Трубецкой К.Н., Галченко Ю.П., Озарян Ю.А. Экологическая цена минерального сырья как потенциальный регулятор технологической парадигмы недропользования при устойчивом развитии. Известия Тульского государственного университета. Науки о Земле. 2021; 2:396-409. Trubetskoy K.N., Galchenko Yu.P., Ozaryan Yu.A. Ecological price of mineral raw materials as a potential regulator of the technological paradigm of subsurface use with sustainable development. Proceedings of Tula State University. Earth Sciences. 2021; 2: 396-409. (In Russ.). https://doi. org/10.46689/2218-5194-2021-2-1-396-409.
  17. 17. Пинтер Л., Харди П., Бартельмус П. Показатели устойчивого развития: предложения по дальнейшему развитию. 2005. URL: https:// translated.turbopages.org/proxy_u/en-ru.ru.1e6d4a20-690b0734-8507d283- 74722d776562/https/www.iisd.org/system/fiies/pubiications/measure_ indicators_sd_way_forw ard.pdf. Pinter L., Hardy Р., Barthelmus P. Indicators of sustainable development: proposals for further development. 2005. URL: https://transiated.turbopages. org/proxy_u/en-ru.ru.1e6d4a20-690b0734-8507d283-74722d776562/https/web.archive.org/web/ 20240708130031/ https:/www.iisd.olrg/system/ files/publications/measure_indicators_sd_way_forward.pdf. (In Russ.).
  18. 18. Шуберт Р. Биоиндикация загрязнений наземных экосистем. Москва, 2010: 320. Schubert R. Bioindication of pollution of terrestrial ecosystems. Moscow, 2010: 320. (In Russ.).
  19. 19. Afum B.O., Ben-Awuah E.A. Review of models and algorithms for surface-underground mining potions and transitions optimization: Some lessons learn and the way forward. Mining. 2021; 1: 112-134.
  20. 20. Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensociologie. Wien; New-York, 1964: 135.
  21. 21. Koronkevich N.I., Barabanova E.A., Geoprgiadi A.G., et al. Environmental and Economic Indicators of Antronogenic Impacts on Water Resources in Russia and the World. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020; 90 (4) :428-436. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331620040103.
  22. 22. Жарко В.О., Бартелев С.А. Оценка распознаваемости древесных пород леса на основе спутниковых данных о сезонных изменениях их спектрально-отражательных характеристик. Современные проблемы дистанционного зондирования Земли из космоса. 2014; 11 (3): 159-170. Zharko V.O., Bartelev S.A. Assessment of the recognizability of forest tree species based on satellite data on seasonal changes in their spectral and reflective characteristics. Modern problems of remote sensing of the Earth from space. 2014; 11 (3): 159-170. (In Russ.).
  23. 23. Галченко Ю.П., Ерёменко В.А. Природно-технические системы подземной разработки рудных месторождений на основе конвергентных горных технологий. Москва, 2023: 288. Galchenko Yu.P., Eremenko V.A. Natural and technical systems of underground mining of ore deposits based on convergent mining technologies. Moscow, 2023: 288. (In Russ.).
  24. 24. Ганжара Н.Ф. Почвоведение. Москва, 2001: 392. Ganzhara N.F. Soil Science. Moscow, 2001: 392. (In Russ.).
  25. 25. Ващенко Т.А., Миронычев К.А., Коничев В.С. Основы почвоведения, земледелия и агрохимии. Москва, 2013: 176. Vashchenko T.A., Mironychev K.A., Konichev V.S. Fundamentals of soil science, agriculture and agrochemistry. Moscow, 2013: 176. (In Russ.).
  26. 26. Вальков В.Ф., Денисов Т.В., Казеев К.Ш. и др. Плодородие почв: экологические, социальные и почвенно-генетические особенности. Ростов-на-Дону, 2013: 301. Valkov V.F., Denisov T.V., Kazeev K.Sh., Kolesnikov S.I. Soil fertility: ecological, social, and soil-genetic features. Rostov-on-Don, 2013:301. (In Russ.).
  27. 27. James Paul, Andy Skerry. Auditing cities with the help of Sustainability Circles. URL: https://translated.turbopages.org/proxy_u/en-ru.1e6d4a20-69b0734-8507d283-74722d776563/https/ /www.researchgate.net/publication/287263249.

 

Управление топливными ресурсами

New materials